You knew better.
Maybe you even told yourself, I’m not going to do that again.
Then the same kind of situation came around, and somehow you made the same choice, reacted the same way, or ended up with the same result.
Afterward comes the familiar question:
Why do I keep making the same mistakes when I already know better?
It can happen in relationships, money, work, family, communication, anger, resentment, habits, or almost any other area of life.
We often assume the problem is that we need more willpower, more motivation, or better self-control.
Sometimes we do.
But there may be a more important question:
What am I using to decide what makes sense in the moment?
Repeating the Same Mistakes Usually Has a Reason
Most of us don’t deliberately choose what we believe will make our lives worse.
We make decisions that seem reasonable to us at the time.
That matters.
If I repeatedly make the same kind of mistake, simply telling myself to “make better choices” may not solve the problem. I need to understand why the wrong choice keeps looking like the right choice—or at least an acceptable one—when I make it.
Consider some common beliefs:
If it feels right, it must be right.
If everyone else is doing it, it can’t be that bad.
If I avoid the problem, maybe it will go away.
If admitting I was wrong makes me look weak, I should defend myself.
If something makes me uncomfortable, I probably shouldn’t do it.
If I meant well, I didn’t really do anything wrong.
These are more than passing thoughts.
Whether we realize it or not, they can function as principles—rules we use to make decisions.
And if the principle is faulty, following it consistently can produce consistently bad results.
Knowing Better Isn’t the Same as Practicing Better
This helps explain one of life’s most frustrating experiences:
I know better. Why don’t I do better?
Because knowing something intellectually and having it available as a practiced response are not necessarily the same thing.
You may know that becoming defensive usually makes an argument worse.
You may know that avoiding a problem doesn’t solve it.
You may know that spending money you don’t have will eventually create trouble.
You may know that saying something in anger will probably make the situation worse.
That’s knowledge.
But when the situation actually occurs, something else has already been practiced and has become part of your natural response.
A familiar emotional response appears. Familiar thinking follows. A familiar decision gets made.
Later, when the emotion has passed, you can see what happened.
You knew better.
But you did the same thing, not something different.
What we repeatedly practice matters because repeated actions become familiar responses. Familiar responses become habits. And habits practiced long enough shape our character and, therefore, our responses.
That means lasting change usually requires more than recognizing the mistake afterward.
It requires practicing a better principle when the situation actually occurs.
Your Emotions Matter—but They Don’t Determine What Is True
Emotions are important.
Fear may tell us something feels threatening. Anger may tell us we believe something is wrong. Guilt may alert us to something that needs examination. Anxiety may tell us we are uncertain about what comes next.
Our emotions provide information about what is happening inside us.
But they aren’t an infallible guide to what is true or what we should do.
Sometimes doing the right thing feels uncomfortable.
Apologizing can feel uncomfortable.
Admitting we were wrong can feel uncomfortable.
Changing a familiar habit can feel uncomfortable.
Having a necessary conversation can feel uncomfortable.
If our operating principle becomes:
“If it makes me uncomfortable, avoid it,”
then comfort—not wisdom—is making the decision.
A better principle might be:
Courage: Discomfort isn’t a reason to avoid what I know is right.
Now we have something different to practice.
The Problem May Be Deeper Than the Behavior
When we keep repeating the same mistakes, we naturally focus on the behavior.
I need to stop doing that.
That’s understandable, but behavior is often the end of a longer process.
Something happened.
I had an emotional response—one I have practiced so many times that it has become my natural response.
I interpreted what happened according to what I already believed, understood, expected, or valued.
Then I acted.
If I examine only the final action, I may miss everything that led to it.
It means learning to examine what is happening underneath your decisions:
What am I feeling?
What am I thinking?
What am I assuming?
What do I believe is true here?
What principle am I actually following?
And perhaps most importantly:
Is that principle worth following?
Understanding your natural tendencies can make these patterns easier to recognize. The free STAR course can help you identify how you naturally approach situations, decisions, and other people—and where those tendencies may become blind spots.
What Does Practicing a Better Principle Actually Look Like?
Consider a simple example.
A man is criticized by his wife for something he forgot to do.
“You said you were going to take care of that.”
He immediately becomes defensive.
“I’ve had a lot going on. You forget things too.”
Within two minutes, they’re arguing about five other things.
Later, he realizes he did exactly what he promised himself he wouldn’t do: he became defensive again.
His old operating principle wasn’t:
Start an argument with my wife.
He would never consciously choose that.
It was closer to:
Self-protection: When I’m criticized, defend myself.
That principle made sense to him in the moment.
That’s precisely why he keeps using it.
But simply replacing defensiveness with “always accept criticism” wouldn’t be much better.
Criticism isn’t automatically true simply because someone says it is.
The other person has emotions, assumptions, motives, habits, beliefs, and faulty thinking too.
We don’t want to replace defensiveness with groveling.
A better principle would be:
Humility and responsibility: Examine criticism honestly. Accept what is true, take responsibility for what is yours, and don’t accept what isn’t.
So he examines what his wife actually said.
In this case, she’s right.
He said he would do it, and he didn’t.
Instead of immediately defending himself, he says:
“You’re right. I said I’d take care of it, and I didn’t. I’m sorry. I’ll get right to it.”
Notice what happened.
He didn’t grovel.
He didn’t agree that he is irresponsible, doesn’t care, “never remembers anything,” or accept any other accusation that might have been added to the conversation.
He acknowledged what was true, accepted responsibility for what was his, apologized, and took action to correct it.
Had the criticism been false, humility wouldn’t require him to pretend otherwise. He could calmly disagree.
The better principle isn’t:
When someone criticizes me, they’re right.
Nor is it:
When someone criticizes me, defend myself.
It is:
Examine what is being said honestly. Accept and correct what is true. Don’t accept what isn’t.
That’s a principle he can actually practice.
Practicing Better Principles
The same process can be used in many areas of life.
Here are several examples.
Instead of Comfort:
If it’s uncomfortable, avoid it.
Practice Courage:
Discomfort isn’t a reason to avoid what I know is right.
Instead of Self-Protection:
When I’m criticized, defend myself.
Practice Humility and Responsibility:
Examine what is being said honestly. Accept and correct what is true. Don’t accept what isn’t.
Instead of Convenience:
The easiest solution is probably the best one.
Practice Wisdom:
The right course may require difficulty, discomfort, or sacrifice.
And there are dozens more.
These aren’t slogans to memorize.
They are alternatives to practice when the old response appears.
We Cannot Correct What We Never Examine
One reason the same patterns continue is that familiar thinking doesn’t always feel like thinking.
It simply feels true.
“That’s just how I am.”
“That’s how I’ve always handled things.”
“Anyone would react that way.”
“That’s just common sense.”
Maybe.
But what if it isn’t?
What if something you learned years ago, absorbed from the culture around you, developed as a way of protecting yourself, or simply repeated often enough has become a rule you no longer question?
Looking inward can help you discover what you believe.
But discovering what you believe doesn’t automatically tell you whether what you believe is true.
That’s why examination matters.
Don’t merely ask:
What do I believe?
Also ask:
Is it true?
What happens when I live according to it?
Does it hold up when applied consistently?
Is there a better principle to follow?
Recognizing the old principle is only half the job.
We need something better with which to replace it.
Practice Changes More Than the Next Decision
The objective isn’t to spend the rest of your life gritting your teeth and forcing yourself to behave differently.
At first, choosing differently may require considerable conscious effort.
In fact, there is a model you can follow. Practice a new choice deliberately until it begins to become a habit. Continue practicing it by habit, and over time it can become part of your natural response—your character.
Eventually, you may look back and think, “That’s what I’ve always done.”
That’s how character changes.
The old response may still appear at first.
The husband in our example may still feel defensive the next time his wife criticizes him.
The person who avoids difficult conversations may still feel uncomfortable.
The person accustomed to making decisions emotionally may still have the same strong feelings.
The difference is that now there is another choice available.
You recognize the familiar response and deliberately interrupt it:
That’s what I normally do. This time I’m going to practice something different instead.
Do it once, and you’ve made a different choice.
Do it repeatedly, and you’re developing a different habit.
Continue practicing that habit, and over time it will shape your character.
Principle → Practice → Habit → Character
Eventually, something that once required considerable conscious effort may become increasingly natural.
That’s why the goal is bigger than simply avoiding one more mistake.
We’re practicing a different way of living.
So Why Do I Keep Making the Same Mistakes?
Possibly because you’re trying to change the result without changing what repeatedly produces it.
The mistake itself may not be the whole problem.
The deeper problem may be the belief, assumption, emotional reaction, habitual response, or principle that keeps making the same decision seem reasonable.
So the next time you find yourself asking:
“Why did I do that again?”
don’t stop with the mistake.
Investigate it.
Ask:
What was I feeling?
What did I believe was happening?
What did I tell myself was true?
What principle did I actually follow?
What did following that principle produce?
Was the principle itself true?
What better principle could I practice the next time this happens?
Then don’t stop at understanding the answer.
Practice it.
Recognizing what keeps producing the same mistake is an important beginning. But knowing what needs to change doesn’t automatically change a response you’ve practiced repeatedly. Why Is It So Hard to Change My Behavior? looks at what happens next.
The Layman’s Way
Don’t just ask:
“Why do I keep making the same mistakes?”
Ask:
“What am I repeatedly believing, choosing, or practicing that keeps producing them?”
Identify the principle.
Examine whether it’s true.
Replace what is faulty with something better.
Then practice the better principle when the opportunity comes.
Once is an action.
Repeated actions can become habits.
Habits practiced long enough shape character.
You don’t overcome a repeated mistake merely by knowing better. You begin changing it by practicing better.
Leave a Reply