Maybe you have wondered:
Why do I overthink everything?
Why am I so sensitive?
Why do I care so much about what other people think?
Why can’t I just make a decision?
Why do I always need everything organized?
Why can’t I just let things go?
Questions like these sound as though we are trying to understand ourselves. But there is something important hidden inside them.
We have already reached a conclusion.
If I ask, “Why do I overthink everything?” I have already accepted that I overthink. I am no longer asking whether the description is accurate. I am asking someone to explain why I am that way.
That conclusion may have come from me. It may have come from a spouse, parent, teacher, friend, counselor, social media post, or something I have heard repeatedly throughout my life.
But before trying to explain it—or fix it—there is a more important question:
Is It True?
This sounds simple, but we often skip it.
Someone says, “You think too much.”
Is that true?
“You’re too sensitive.”
Is that true?
“You’re stubborn.”
Is that true?
“You care too much about what other people think.”
Again: Is that true?
The purpose of asking isn’t to become defensive. Sometimes criticism is accurate. There are things about all of us that need examination and change.
But neither should we automatically accept someone’s assessment simply because they made it confidently, repeated it frequently, or because we have heard something similar before.
Before accepting a judgment about ourselves, we need to examine it.
Who Says?
This isn’t meant as a defiant response.
It is a legitimate question about the standard being used.
Suppose one person likes to gather information, examine possibilities, consider what could go wrong, and understand something thoroughly before making a decision. Another person sees the objective, determines that enough information is available, and wants to get moving.
The second person may look at the first and say:
“You overthink everything.”
The first may look back and think:
“You don’t think things through.”
Who is right?
Possibly neither.
They may simply be looking at the same situation from two different natural perspectives.
This happens constantly in everyday life. We naturally tend to evaluate other people through the way we see and approach the world. Without realizing it, our perspective can become the standard by which we judge theirs.
I wouldn’t need that much information, so you’re overthinking.
I wouldn’t say that so directly, so you’re insensitive.
I wouldn’t worry about how everyone feels, so you’re too sensitive.
I wouldn’t change the plan at the last minute, so you’re irresponsible.
The problem becomes obvious once we see it:
Different from me does not mean wrong.
Personality May Be Part of the Answer
One possible explanation is personality.
People naturally differ in the way they gather information, make decisions, approach problems, relate to people, organize their lives, and move toward results. What appears excessive or deficient from one person’s perspective may make considerably more sense when viewed from another.
This is one reason understanding personality can be useful.
In the STAR Personality framework, people tend to approach life through different combinations of four perspectives: Structured, Technical, Action, and Relationship.
A Structured-leading person may naturally value order, consistency, planning, and established processes.
A Technical-leading person may naturally want to understand, analyze, investigate, and make sense of things.
An Action-leading person may naturally focus on movement, opportunity, results, and getting things done.
A Relationship-leading person may naturally notice people, harmony, feelings, and how decisions affect others.
None of these perspectives is automatically better than another.
Yet put them together in a marriage, workplace, family, church committee, or friendship and something interesting can happen.
What one person experiences as careful analysis, another experiences as overthinking. What one experiences as decisive action, another sees as impulsiveness. What one sees as maintaining appropriate order, another sees as rigidity. What one sees as caring about people, another calls being overly sensitive.
Sometimes what we have been trying to fix may simply be a natural difference that someone—including us—has misunderstood.
That doesn’t mean personality explains everything. It certainly doesn’t mean, “That’s just the way I am, so everyone else has to accept it.”
It means personality is one possibility worth examining before deciding something is wrong.
If the question you are asking may involve differences in how you naturally think, organize, decide, act, or relate to people, learning more about personality may help you identify what you are actually seeing. The STAR Personality Course was developed specifically to help people understand those differences without treating one perspective as better or worse than another.
Different Does Not Mean Wrong
Suppose after examining the accusation you conclude:
“Yes, I do think things through considerably more than the person who said that about me.”
That may be true.
But is it wrong?
Perhaps you really are more sensitive to how words affect people. Perhaps you really do prefer greater order. Perhaps you really do make decisions more quickly than others.
Those observations can all be accurate without describing defects.
This distinction matters because people can spend years trying to change something about themselves that never needed fixing.
The question isn’t simply:
Is this description true?
We also need to ask:
If it is true, is there actually something wrong with it?
Personality Is Not an Excuse
There is another side to this.
Understanding personality should never become an excuse for poor behavior.
A Relationship-leading person may naturally care deeply about maintaining harmony. That isn’t a defect. But refusing to tell someone an important truth because you cannot tolerate their displeasure is something different.
A Technical-leading person may naturally examine something thoroughly. That isn’t overthinking simply because someone else would have decided sooner. But continuing to analyze when sufficient information is available because you are unwilling to risk making an imperfect decision may be a problem.
An Action-leading person may naturally move quickly toward a result. That isn’t recklessness. But knowingly ignoring important consequences because they interfere with getting the desired result is another matter.
A Structured-leading person may naturally value order and proven procedures. That isn’t rigidity. But insisting that a procedure must be followed when it no longer serves its intended purpose may need examination.
Personality can help explain how we naturally approach something.
It does not determine whether everything we do is right.
If Something Is Wrong, What Is It?
Suppose after honest examination you conclude that something really does need attention.
Now we need to be just as careful as we were when examining the original judgment.
Don’t jump from:
Something needs changing
to:
Something is wrong with me.
Instead ask:
What specifically am I dealing with?
The possibilities are broad.
It might involve something you don’t know or understand. It might involve a skill you never learned. It might involve something emotional, mental, relational, or spiritual. It might involve a belief you have accepted, something you value, a moral or ethical standard, a repeated behavior, a principle you practice, or a habit that has developed over time.
There may be other possibilities as well.
The point isn’t to create another label for yourself. The point is to identify the problem accurately enough that you can begin looking for the right kind of answer.
That matters because different problems require different solutions.
If I don’t understand something, I may need knowledge.
If I lack a skill, I may need instruction and practice.
If I have accepted something false, I need to discover what is true.
If I already know what is right but repeatedly choose something else, more information may not solve the problem at all.
And if what I thought was a defect turns out to be a natural personality difference, perhaps that part of me never needed fixing in the first place.
What Do You Believe About Yourself?
There is another reason accurate identification matters.
If you are asking, “Why am I too sensitive?” there is a good chance you have already accepted—at least to some degree—the belief that you are too sensitive.
Maybe someone repeatedly told you:
“You’re selfish.”
“You’re lazy.”
“You’re too emotional.”
“You never finish anything.”
“You’re difficult.”
Eventually, someone else’s description can become something more than an opinion. It can become something we believe about ourselves.
And what we believe about ourselves matters—but what is true about ourselves matters more.
Beliefs influence what we recognize, how we interpret situations, and the choices we make. The fact that you believe something does not make it true.
But discovering that something isn’t true doesn’t necessarily mean it immediately stops influencing you either.
That is another problem worth identifying accurately.
The question then becomes more specific than “What’s wrong with me?”
It becomes:
What do I believe, why do I believe it, and is it true?
Criticism is one way these beliefs about ourselves can begin. Learning how to examine criticism without automatically accepting or rejecting it can help.
That is a much better place to begin looking for an answer.
When You Already Know What Is Right
There is one kind of problem we can take a little further.
Sometimes we already know what needs changing.
I know I shouldn’t speak to someone that way when I’m angry.
I know I should admit when I’m wrong.
I know avoiding the conversation isn’t solving the problem.
I know I need to keep the commitment I made.
In situations like these, lack of knowledge may not be the problem. We already know the better way.
Now the issue becomes whether we are willing to choose and practice it.
A principle that is merely understood doesn’t automatically govern our behavior. It has to be chosen and practiced.
Suppose I know that when someone criticizes me, the better response is:
Examine what is being said honestly. Accept and correct what is true. Don’t accept what isn’t.
The next time criticism comes, I have an opportunity to practice that principle instead of automatically defending myself.
Then I practice it again.
Repeated practice produces habits. Habits shape character.
The objective isn’t to grit our teeth forever and force ourselves to behave differently. Through repeated practice, a better response can increasingly become the way we respond.
Principle → practice → habit → character.
That isn’t the answer to every problem.
But when we already know what is right and our repeated behavior is the problem, it gives us something specific we can do.
If you know what needs to change but struggle to do it consistently, understanding why behavior is so difficult to change can help.
Identify First. Then Look for the Right Answer.
You may not find the complete answer to whatever brought you to this article here.
That’s intentional.
“Something is wrong with me” doesn’t tell us enough to know what the answer should be.
The problem might involve personality, knowledge, beliefs, values, behavior, relationships, emotions, spiritual matters, skills, habits, or something else entirely.
No single article—and no single organization—has every answer.
But accurately identifying what you are dealing with changes the search.
Instead of asking:
What’s wrong with me?
you may discover that your real question is:
How do different personality types make decisions?
How do I learn something I was never taught?
Why do I believe this about myself?
How do I handle this particular emotion?
What should I do when I know what is right but keep doing something else?
Those are much better questions.
And once you know the question, look for reliable knowledge. That answer may come from NILT (Now, In Layman’s Terms). It may come from a teacher, book, course, pastor, counselor, qualified professional, trusted friend, or another resource with knowledge appropriate to the problem.
The objective isn’t to make NILT the answer to everything.
The objective is to help you find an answer that is true and useful.
Before You Try to Fix Yourself
There may be things about you that need changing. There are things about all of us that do.
But there may also be things you have spent years trying to change simply because someone else decided you should be different.
So before asking:
Why am I like this?
How do I stop doing this?
What’s wrong with me?
Start here:
Is it true?
Who says—and by what standard?
Could what I am seeing simply be a personality difference?
If the description is true:
Is it actually wrong, or is it simply different?
If something really does need attention:
What specifically am I dealing with?
Then let the problem determine the direction of your search.
If you need knowledge, learn.
If you need a skill, find someone who can teach it.
If you have accepted a belief, examine whether it is true.
If you need specialized help, look for someone qualified to provide it.
If you already know what is right but aren’t living according to it, begin practicing the better principle.
And if what you’ve been calling a defect is simply a natural difference in personality, perhaps the answer isn’t learning how to fix it.
Perhaps the answer is finally understanding it.
Identify accurately first. Then seek the answer that fits what you have actually identified.
That is where meaningful change can begin.
Leave a Reply